By David Lawder
WASHINGTON, Aug 25 (Reuters) – The global economy has weathered the Iran war energy shock better than feared, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said on Tuesday, but she raised concerns about deteriorating fiscal conditions in some countries shown by rising bond yields and a stalled disinflation process.
Georgieva told reporters in a briefing ahead of next week’s Group of 20 finance leaders meeting in Asheville, North Carolina, that there was a “tug of war” between the negative Gulf energy supply shock and growth tailwinds from the artificial intelligence investment boom that was starting to spread beyond U.S. borders.
She said risks to the global outlook were more balanced than in April, but still tilted to the downside, due to mounting fiscal pressures and the potential that central banks will have to maintain tight monetary policy to control inflation.
Global growth is “resisting powerful headwinds from high debt levels, stubborn inflation, and trade tensions. Thus far, it has weathered the energy shock caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz better than we feared, thanks to a combination of factors,” Georgieva said.
These factors include drawdowns of oil and gas reserves by many countries, increases in non-Gulf energy supplies, lower energy demand, increased renewable energy capacity and a return to coal power generation in some places.
Artificial intelligence investment in the U.S. is keeping corporate earnings and consumer spending strong, and other countries are ramping up data-center construction and AI hardware supplies, she said.
Her overview of global economic conditions did not come with any new forecasts. The IMF in July lowered its 2026 global growth forecast to a sluggish 3.0%, while warning of further downside risks from the Middle East war, trade fragmentation and potential AI uncertainty.
It will next update its global growth forecast in mid-October at IMF and World Bank annual meetings in Bangkok.
ENERGY SHOCK ‘NOT OVER’
Georgieva warned against complacency by policy makers amid benchmark Brent crude oil prices that have been hovering in the $80-$90 per barrel range since mid-June, well below their spring peaks above $118.
“The energy shock is not over,” Georgieva said. “A renewed rise in oil prices could fuel inflation, forcing central banks to retain a restrictive policy stance with knock-on implications on debt service costs and on economic activity.”
She said that all countries need to tackle their fiscal problems and “formulate and present credible plans to ensure their debt and deficits are on a sustainable path.”
She did not single out individual countries needing fiscal consolidation. But her comments follow last week’s spike in U.S. Treasury 30-year bond yields to 19-year highs that prompted Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to announce a surprise doubling of long bond buyback sizes in an effort to hold down borrowing costs.
The IMF has long called on Washington to reduce its growing fiscal deficits, which would also help shrink U.S. trade and current account deficits.
Georgieva said central banks must stay “laser-focused” on their price stability mandates amid continued inflation risks, despite expressing concern that tight monetary policy would cool growth.
She also said countries needed to address “excess global imbalances” that were causing trade tensions. She did not name specific countries, but Georgieva has long called on China to rebalance its growth model away from exports that have flooded global markets with cheap goods, towards one driven by internal consumer demand.
“A better balanced economy is a stronger global economy, and that is good for everyone,” she said, adding that this was harder to achieve in a more fragmented world.
The IMF is refining its model for assessing external balances, she said, and will deepen its analysis of the drivers of these imbalances, including the interaction of macroeconomic trends, trade and industrial policy in a series of forthcoming papers.
(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Paul Simao and Daniel Wallis)
Comments